Why I Critique Greta Thunberg & The Climate Alarmists

Since releasing some content that was critical and skeptical of the current alarmism & politicization of the environmentalist movement, the lunacy of the extinction rebellion cult and the suspiciously sudden and monumental rise of the global Greta phenomenon, I have received incredible support and valuable feedback from most. However, I have also since been accused by some as being "uncaring" "insensitive" "deluded & paranoid" and of also being "a typical insecure cis-white-male" simply for expressing my views and concerns. 
In this Drive With Dave episode I take on these false and ridiculous claims and clarify my position and intention. 

LINKS: 
Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions

Do you think the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is promoting science rather than socialism?  Read the following admission from the co-chair of the UN IPCC Working Group III, during an interview in 2010 with the Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung:

“We must free ourselves from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy … We must state clearly that we use climate policy de facto to redistribute the world’s wealth.”

The Great Climate Debate Pt. 2 Feat. Ralph Ellis 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZiK85LW5no&t=4899s

Global warming is a blatant lie PROOF
https://youtu.be/EHFfOOF-6Fs

Debunking EVERY Climate Argument With Geologist Tony Heller
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIBP8vKVf0M

In the 1970s, we were told we were in a global cooling crisis and if something wasn’t done, we’d enter a new ice age.

When that didn’t happen, a few decades later we were told that entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend was not reversed by the year 2000.

We’re now being told we only have 12 years to combat climate change, and the solution is to fundamentally dismantle the system of free enterprise. That means the government and the UN controls things like how we produce our energy, what food we eat, and what type of cars we drive.

The question is, even if we believed their alarmist, catastrophic predictions, would their proposals work?

Not according to the climate scientists’ own models. Based on those models, even if the United States cut its carbon dioxide emissions to zero, it would only avert global warming by a few tenths of a degree Celsius—in 80 years.

We would see no noticeable difference in the climate, yet it would come at an enormous cost to the American people.

Climate change is happening, and human activity undoubtedly plays a role, but big-government climate policies are all economic pain, no environmental gain.

50 years of failed doomsday, eco-pocalyptic predictions; the so-called ‘experts’ are 0-50.
https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/50-years-of-failed-doomsday-eco-pocalyptic-predictions-the-so-called-experts-are-0-50/

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti admitted recently that the true motivation behind introducing the Green New Deal is to overhaul the “entire economy.”
“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal, is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” Chakrabarti said to Inslee’s climate director, Sam Ricketts.
“Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,” he added.

“We must free ourselves from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy … We must state clearly that we use climate policy de facto to redistribute the world’s wealth.”
- Also from the top: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

 — “The First Global Revolution” (1991) — Published by the Club of Rome